← council-level findings on this theme
18 Sep 2025At the 18 September 2025 Kent County Council meeting, the Leader's report recorded that she had written to the Home Secretary asking to be consulted early and given transparency before any new migrant accommodation sites are identified in Kent, and had separately written to all 12 Kent district/borough leaders asking for details of migrant accommodation in their areas, after flagging Dover, Manston and Napier Barracks as known sites plus a concern that further hotels or HMOs could be in use unannounced; as of the meeting the Home Secretary had not replied. [1][2][3]
18 Nov 2025On 18 November 2025 Kent County Council's Children, Young People and Education Cabinet Committee heard that KCC's statutory Sufficiency Strategy — which covers placements for children in care, including unaccompanied asylum-seeking children (UASC) — needed to be revamped following a 2023 High Court judgment on UASC; officers framed this as a prevention- and in-house-provision-focused update to meet the statutory duty, not a decision to cap, pause or withdraw from UASC intake or the National Transfer Scheme. [4][5]
At the March 2026 Kent County Council meeting, Mr Wimble proposed and Mr Eustace seconded a motion declaring an 'Illegal Migration Emergency in Kent', which the Council carried unanimously (45 for, 0 against, 0 abstentions); it calls on the Leader to press the Government to stop small-boat arrivals and to fully fund the costs to the County Council and partner agencies of dealing with illegal migration, but the motion's text does not name asylum hotels or Home Office accommodation specifically. [6][7][8][9]
At the March 2026 Kent County Council meeting the Leader's report cited children's services cost pressures — including the cost of supporting former unaccompanied asylum-seeking children and the number of looked-after children placed in Kent by other authorities — as grounds for demanding a fairer long-term funding settlement from central government; this is a demand for more funding/support from the Home Office and other authorities, not a decision by Kent to limit its own UASC intake. [10]